14 thoughts on “Soal Conditional Sentence Type 3 dan Jawaban”

1. Habibah  April 13, 2020 at 14:18

   Kak, jadi nomer 4 itu inverter word pake bare infinitive dari (run) ya bukan ran

   1. Wilma Yulia  April 13, 2020 at 14:22

      Past participle itu, bukan bare infinitive, Habibah 😀

2. anonymous  December 16, 2019 at 03:21

   If you had woken up earlier, you could have *saw* the beautiful sunrise. Harusnya bentuk V3 see adalah seen

   1. Wilma Yulia  December 16, 2019 at 06:20

      Thanks for your correction… 🙂 I am sorry for the silly mistake.

3. Farhan  April 28, 2016 at 14:41

   mba wilma bisa minta contact bbmnya atau line gtu?

   1. Wilma Yulia  April 29, 2016 at 11:39

      lewat sini atau email aja Farhan… saya gak pny bbm dan jrg ngecek line

4. Syafrizal  January 18, 2016 at 12:41

   Kak, yg nomor 4 itu kan bentuknya inverted condition, tp q msh blm ngerti knp bisa kaya gitu. Mohon pnjlsn nya ya kak, thanks

   1. Wilma Yulia  January 20, 2016 at 13:23

      Halo Syafrizal.. nomor 4 verb (auxiliary) nya muncul sebelum subject ya… saya pikir tujuan inverted word order pada conditional untuk memberi penekanan (pada kasus ini tindakan yang seharusnya dilakukan) atau variasi (gak melulu conditional normal word order), sesuai dgn definisi dari merriam-webster:

      Definition of inverted order

      an arrangement of the elements of a sentence (as subject, predicate) that is the reverse of the usual order and is designed to achieve variety or emphasis (as in “among them were the following” “again she called”) or to indicate a question (as in “what does he say”) http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/inverted%20order

5. Zain  May 8, 2015 at 09:41

   sorry q mau nanya ttg soal cond sentence type 3
   yg no 6 kok jwbnnya wouldn’t have been deported?
   knp jwbnnya gk wouldn’t have deported?
   kok beda sama no 3
   mhn pnjelasannya trims,,

   1. Wilma Yulia  May 9, 2015 at 01:27

      Bentuk passive itu zain.. jadi dideportasi, bukan mendeportasi..
      active (-): would + not + have + v-3 (past participle)
      passive (-): would + not + have + been + v-3 (past participle)

6. java  March 28, 2015 at 18:03

   itu got ya kak ?? bukan gotten kak, pakai verb 3 ?

   1. Wilma Yulia  March 31, 2015 at 07:15

      Alternatif Java :B

      Got is the past tense form as well as one of the two alternatives for the past participle. The other alternative for the past participle is gotten, which is generally preferred in the United States. http://www.mit.edu/course/21/21.guide/get-got.htm

7. Rizaldy  September 12, 2014 at 14:08

   Kenapa ada kata yang ditambahi ‘-n’ ?
   Maaf masih pemula

   1. Wilma Yulia  September 12, 2014 at 15:00

      “wouldn’t” gini ya Rizaldy? contraction (kata atau set angka yang satu/lebih huruf/angkanya telah dihilangkan) itu. Versi aslinya “would not”.. gak usah minta maaf, santai aja kayak di pantai.. 😀